I complained about their previous advertisement which showed vomiting - pointed out this was a common phobia and was insensitive and unnecessary (they didn’t show the reality of people having diarrhoea, after all).
https://www.civilsociety.co.uk/news/macmillan-ad-ninth-most-complained-about-of-2017.html
I don’t expect upmarket or twee tampon/Tena-like adverts. I know they depend heavily on people making donations and that’s their objective. But I wonder if they should reconsider the advertising company they use and their prospective audience - cancer is dark enough without seeing it on tv daily, reinforcing fear. We know it’s bad - it doesn’t make Macmillan look any more effective to rub it in. And there are people like me who are lucky enough to be able to see it as ‘only a disease.’ It’s not a death sentence necessarily.
I don’t think I’m unduly sensitive. There must be better ways of advertising something so awful. OK, the short ads where they get good news are a bit galling for someone like me - but I wouldn’t want to push my experience onto other people. I don’t want to hide the truth but there are different realities for different people.
No comments:
Post a Comment